President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer Jay Sekulow said on Sunday that the U.S. Supreme Court may ultimately be called on to decide the scope of presidential pardon power. If that happens, the justices will likely dust off one of the few cases in which the high court has ruled on the pardon power: the 1866 decision in Ex Parte Garland, involving one of the most prolific—and acerbic—advocates before the court: Augustus Garland.
- Amid Delays, Politics Leave US Attorney Prospects in Limbo
- Facebook Lawyer Details 'Fake News' Fight
- Fish & Richardson IP Litigator Changes Name, Gender
- Shout-Out: Wilson Sonsini’s $1B Save
- Kasowitz Partner Leaves to Run Practice Group at Tarter Krinsky
- One Giant Leap: How Lawyer Won Apollo 11 Moondust Case
Following a string of successful mortgage-backed securities cases against most of the banking industry, Philippe Selendy of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan notched another achievement this week.