Because Lawyers Failed to Reveal Juror's Lies, Judge Rejects Client's Bid for New Trial

, The Litigation Daily


The failure of lawyers at Brune & Richard to reveal that they knew a juror in their client's trial was lying doesn't mean that they gave their client ineffective counsel, a federal court judge in Manhattan ruled Thursday. The client, former Deutsche Bank accountant David Parse, was convicted in 2011 in a trial over a tax shelter scheme allegedly set up by codefendant Paul Daugerdas, a former Jenkens & Gilchrist partner.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202583476808

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.